The Blogger Rights
Posted by JoFeb 25
Bloggers and blogging have come to the news again with a Supreme Court ruling on the latest case of Ajith, an 18 yr old blogger from Kerala. Ajith had started an Orkut community against Shiv Sena and the community message board had received messages alleging that Shiv Sena is trying to divide the country on region and caste basis.
Times of India reports on blogger Ajith’s case:
Reacting to these posts, the Shiv Sena youth wing’s state secretary registered a criminal complaint at Thane police station in August 2008 based on which FIR was registered against Ajith under Sections 506 and 295A pertaining to hurting public sentiment.
Ajith then sought an anticipatory bail from Kerala High Court and approached Supreme Court to quash the criminal complaint. But the SC did not favour the blogger. SC bench said “We cannot quash criminal proceedings. You are a computer student and you know how many people access internet portals. Hence, if someone files a criminal action on the basis of the content, then you will have to face the case. You have to go before the court and explain your conduct.” Now the boy has to face the court in Maharashtra, the home of Shiv Sena, and he is afraid of his life for obvious reasons.
One of the main advantages of blogging is that it allows you to express your opinion freely and fearlessly. Agreed that some bloggers misuse this, i.e. indulging in personal abuse, and such people should be brought to law if the offended person decides to do so and if there is a strong case. I emphasize on the word “strong case” because there should not be a situation where anyone can drag anyone to court based on mere allegations. In the light of new ruling, bloggers would resort to politically correct statements, which would not help much in open debates and discussions and it will take out the spirit of blogging and make it function like mainstream media.
Another sad thing is that the court now says that a blogger can be booked for the comments posted in his/her blog. It is true that mainstream media has such laws applicable to them, but blogging does not function like main mainstream media. Blogging is an opinion medium, not a reporting medium and should be kept at that and exceptions of law should be made in that line.
But bloggers are not above the law. Perhaps the discussions on Ajith’s case would make bloggers become more responsible in their writing. By citing proofs/data/references to backup their statements/claims, which is good in the long run for a maturing media like Blog.
Now let us look into what the Delaware Supreme Court (in the USA) ruled in a similar case back in 2005. They reversed a lower court decision that had required an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official on a newspaper site. Following were the comments from Chief Justice Myron Steele:
“Given the context, no reasonable person could have interpreted these statements as being anything other than opinion. … The statements are, therefore, incapable of a defamatory meaning,” Chief Justice Myron Steele wrote in his ruling, noting that blogs are inherently filled with opinion.
Steele described the Internet as a “unique democratizing medium unlike anything that has come before,” and said anonymous speech in blogs and chat rooms in some instances can become the modern equivalent of political pamphleteering. Accordingly, a plaintiff claiming defamation should be required to provide sufficient evidence to overcome a defendant’s motion for summary judgment before a court orders the disclosure of a blogger’s identity.
“We are concerned that setting the standard too low will chill potential posters from exercising their First Amendment right to speak anonymously,” Steele wrote. “The possibility of losing anonymity in a future lawsuit could intimidate anonymous posters into self-censoring their comments or simply not commenting at all.”
Now compare this with our Supreme Court rule in Ajith’s case and think about it.
Also read: 100 Essential Legal and Privacy Guides for Bloggers
Related posts:
- Left & Right – United The Blogger RightsThe Varkala Murder case (in Kerala State) and...
- Heavy Metal blogger meet @ Bangalore The Blogger RightsIt’s the first blogger meet especially for all...
- New website for Audio India The Blogger Rights Hello! We have a new home for...
- The times of Times of India The Blogger RightsI admit that when I read a news...
- Nandita – New music blogger The Blogger RightsHere is a new music blogger who needs...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.




12 comments
Comment by Ajith | Blog Money on February 26, 2009 at 9:27 am
The Mangalore like incidents have started happening in Bangalore as well.. Yesterday two women were attacked in Indira Nagar for wearing western clothes… Check out the news in Hindu.
I don’t know what’s happening to this nation all of a sudden. Are we becoming more religious for the wrong reasons?
http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/26/stories/2009022658410300.htm
Comment by Which Main? What Cross? on February 26, 2009 at 11:31 am
i have many things ti say. But I don’t want to be sued
Comment by Ashik on February 26, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Well if thats the case, then lets all put a post saying Shiv sena is bad in all our blogs Lets see ho all they will sue.
Comment by Praveen George on February 26, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Jo,
Read the article, to the point and extremely educating,
It is a rather concerning development , especially at a time when Indian bloggers were beginning to use blogs to form political opinions. I have written an article with slighty different sentiment at http://praveengeorge.mobchannel.com , not very objective like what you wrote though
Comment by Manikandan on February 26, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Dear Joe,
I think there must some freedom to express one’s views through blog. If some one challange each and every statements made through blog on court I feel it will not be healthy. Most of our court proceedings are never ending. I doubt such practices will end this medium of expression. At the same personal abuses and racial abuses should be eliminated in blog.
Comment by viplove on February 26, 2009 at 11:33 pm
this clearly shows us that Judiciary in our country is dictatorial, why not court suo-moto takes action on thousands of porn websites working in this country, why not they took action against these far right, anti social elements, and where was the supreme court when so many riots and attacks were going on, Didnt these riots were harming the secular entity of India.
Join ‘Blue ribbon campaign’ to, fight against online censorship and for right to free speech. Ajith you r not alone, we are with you, the people of india are with you…
Comment by Jo on February 26, 2009 at 11:43 pm
Ajith – Thanks for the link!
Gopal – The power of freedom of speech
Ashik – They might pick up the least known ones.
Praveen – Thanks for sharing the link to your post Praveen. I will check it out.
Manikandan – You are right Mani. This move is kind of making people dare not to talk about anything against Judiciary as it is the most celebrated/revered system in any country. The courts have to see that for the common man, they are the last hope for justice and should uphold that hope of the citizens.
Viplove – What’s wrong with porn sites?
Comment by Haree on February 27, 2009 at 10:29 am
• Boy is 19-year old. (according to ToI Report) Means, he will not be considered as a minor.
• He started an Orkut community and NOT a blog. And it is ‘AGAINST Shiv-Sena’.
• “Another sad thing is that the court now says that a blogger can be booked for the comments posted in his/her blog.” – The publisher is always responsible for the content. In case of blogs, it’s the blog owner. In case of Orkut communities it’s the owner and the moderators. Why is it a sad thing? If a blog owner feels a comment is not appropriate he’s responsible to delete it. And by doing this there’s no harm to ‘freedom-of-expression’ as the comment owner can express the same in his own blog under his responsibility.
• And I’m happy to see that, the court saying, ” if someone files a criminal action on the basis of the content, then you will have to face the case.” The court didn’t tell, you cannot express your views. It only means one should act responsibly while expressing those views.
I dont know how can it be related to blogs? An Orkut community is a group of Orkut members, and nobody is anonymous. I think the case is filed for starting such a community. It’s NOT for making an opinion against Shiv-sena.
” Blogging is an opinion medium, not a reporting medium” – NOT true. It can be a reporting medium as well. Blogging sites are a platform, and we can even build a news portal on it.
–
Comment by Din on February 27, 2009 at 6:55 pm
I thought it is quite ok to write anything as far as the blog does not spread hatred, violence or contain obscene posts / comments. But now it seems we have to take care a lot
Sad, really sad.
Pingback by 100 Essential Legal and Privacy Guides for Bloggers by e-Justice Blog on March 5, 2009 at 3:39 pm
[...] The Blogger Rights: This post follows the story of a young blogger that is being targeted for starting an Orkut community. [...]
Comment by Darrah on October 6, 2009 at 7:55 am
What about a blogger’s rights when it comes to posting libelous accusations? What if I link back to another source and quote what that source said but I didn’t know it was libelous. If there was no malicious intent on my part and just me reporting what the other source said, can I be sued?
I blog about the porn industry and my blog is an adult industry news blog. Many say I’ll get sued one day because of all the things I say about people and the crimes they have committed. I slap the Opinion/Editorial tag up and either report what someone else said or give my opinion about what was said. Can I be sued? Thanks!
Comment by Shrinidhi Hande on February 6, 2010 at 9:08 pm
Supreme court: Is it ok if I write a comment here?